Sma Management Agreement
So what is the entry price for this extra level of individual attention? With technological advances, money management companies have been able to reduce their minimum investment requirements to a level well below the traditional $1 million level. But there is still not a single answer for the thousands of managers who make up the SMA universe. As a general rule, the entrance fee starts at $100,000. SMAS, which is aimed at high net worth retail investors, tends to set minimum balances of between $100,000 and $5 million. In strategies for institutional managers, minimum account sizes can range from $10 million to $100 million. If the RIA assigns only a small amount of assets to a specific manager or strategy, or if the underlying clients are unable to complete individual account minimums, SMAS/UMA with a single contract may be the best way to access the portfolio. In this case, the client signs a single investment advisory agreement with RIA, which invests clients` assets in accounts managed by an SMA platform provider (Envestnet, SEI, AssetMark, Brinker Capital, FTJ FundChoice, etc.). The SMA platform provider, which has a direct relationship with external managers, performs all tax losses, transactions and liquidations. The RIA also relies on the collective purchasing power of the SMA platform provider with the manager. The platform provider will have negotiated the fee directly with the manager, and the RIA will be able, through the vendor-guaranteed scale, to access strategies for agreed management fees. In addition to the reduced management fees, IRAs must also take into account the platform fee charged by the supplier.
For smaller asset allocations, these two combined costs should be a cost-effective option. In the case of larger asset allocations, it may be useful to do some research before determining whether MMS with one or two contracts offer more competitive prices (see image below). Mainstream Fund Services Pty Ltd has been appointed as both Scheme Administrator and System Administrator, in agreement with the responsible agency. At a high level, size is generally important: does an RIA have enough assets to assign it to a particular manager that the third party is willing to negotiate directly with the RIA? And would the company`s clients, with each investment strategy, meet the minimums of individual accounts? In the past, if the answer is “yes,” most consultants have chosen to access the manager through a dual-contract ADM, where the client enters into an investment advisory agreement with the RIA and the investment manager. This allows the RIA to negotiate its own costs with the manager and to have a direct relationship in which it can inform the harvest manager of the tax losses and the date of trading and liquidations. Where the RIA can negotiate a reasonable royalty with the investment manager, this additional level of oversight is often preferred. Much of this information can be accessed in the manager`s ADV Part 1 and 2 form (Part 2 contains more details on strategy, approach and fees, as well as biographical information about the main team members). Performance data must be available directly through the online manager or through personal contact with a management representative.